The Journal of the Jamestown Rediscovery Center
Foreword
Spanish philosopher Jose Ortega y Gasset once asserted
that, "The choice of a point of view is the initial act
of culture" (
1961:7). I believe that
it is also the inaugural step in studying a culture. The
Journal of the Jamestown Rediscovery Center
(
JJRC) is created in the hopes of creating
additional perspectives on the ongoing excavations at the
site of the first permanent English settlement in
America. The journal provides a venue in which
specialists who have worked as consultants on the
Jamestown Rediscovery project will disseminate the
results of their research.

External analyses of the archaeology of James
Fort further
Jamestown Rediscovery's quest for
insight into daily life at Jamestown Island in the time
of European expansion by strengthening the project's
ability to see significant patterns in relevant data and
to determine meaningful relationships. Adopting French
painter Paul Cezanne's appreciation for the position of
the observer--or in this case, the scholar--the
JJRC endeavors to establish an open forum to
"treat the archaeology of Jamestown in terms of the
cultural, the historical, the natural,
all in
perspective" (
1978:13).
The articles in the
JJRC are detailed and
rigorous, sacrificing style for substance when necessary.
Though the subject matter at times requires the use of
technical language, the journal's studies are as
explanatory and straightforward as the topics warrant.
The three articles in Volume 1 detail individual analyses
undertaken on materials uncovered by
Jamestown
Rediscovery excavations at the Fort site. The
selective focus of each study produces high-resolution
observations that serve as springboards for subsequent
interpretive debates.
The examination by Blanton, Deitrick, and Bartels' of
hafted bifaces identifies a correlation in the
Jamestown Rediscovery assemblage between raw
material type and failure frequencies. Locally made
projectile points were usually broken whereas those of
non-local origin exhibited little damage. The pattern
intimates differential use, prompting consideration of
intercultural exchange practices and the distinctiveness
of tribal identity within the Powhatan chiefdom. How and
why did the colonists acquire the unbroken foreign
points? Could they be gifts from distant indigenous
allies of the English?
Lapham's analysis of the
Jamestown Rediscovery
bead assemblage produces both expected and unexpected
results. That over half of the 337 beads are
blue--robin's egg, turquoise, or navy--is no surprise.
The historical records repeatedly mentioned the
popularity of blue beads among the indigenous
populations. Lapham's regional bead comparisons, however,
suggest that Jamestown's early Fort-Period beads have
more in common with 16th-century Spanish finds than with
those from 17th-century English sites. The formal and
temporal uniqueness of
Jamestown Rediscovery's
bead assemblage leads to questions regarding global
commerce and production practices in Venice.
The article by Owsley, Bruwelheide, and Kardash
details an osteological study of two late 18th-century
human skeletons uncovered in the South Churchyard area of
the Fort site. The discussion employs a standardized
method of burial analysis and provides insight into the
lives of the exhumed individuals. The pathological
evidence indicates certain daily life activities of those
at post-1750 Jamestown, including horseback riding,
physical labor, and pipe smoking. The authors also list
the skeletal factors that form the basis of each of their
conclusions.
Volume 1 is the first in a series of annual
collections showcasing additional insights and
perspectives of the
Jamestown Rediscovery project.
I wish to express my gratitude to the authors of the
three articles presented here, to the
JJRC's
Editorial Advisory Board and Associate Editor, and to my
colleagues at
Jamestown Rediscovery--former and
current--for their scholarship, commitment, and support.
With an eye to future
Journals of the Jamestown
Rediscovery Center and an archaeological eye always
fixed on the past, I conclude with poet Henry Austin
Dobson's
Paradox of Time (
1913:18):
Time goes by you say? Ah no!
Alas, Time stays, we go.
Seth Mallios
Founding Editor
Notes
Bernard, Emile
1978
Conversations with Cezanne. Collection Macula, Paris.
Dobson, Henry Austin
1913
Collected Poems. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trhubner & Co., London.
Ortega y Gasset, Jose
1961
Meditations on Quixote. Norton, New York.